Storage Projects in Nepal’s Electricity Development Decade 2016/2026 For Whom Nepal’s Storage Projects Toll?

These storage projects are in addition to Nepal’s 10,800 MW Karnali Chisapani Multipurpose Project of many decades ago now being readied for ‘re-activation’ at an appropriate time. Already in Nepal’s ‘electricity development’ net is the 3,300 MW Saptakoshi High Dam that has strategically roped in the Sunkoshi-Kamala Storage-cum-Diversion scheme . The 6,480 MW Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project, ratified by the Nepalese Parliament in 1996 for making Nepal’s ‘sun rise from the west’, is still stuck in deep quagmires .

Issue Name : Vol.10,No 16,April 7,2017 (Chaitra 25,2073)

Nepal’s Electricity Development Decade 2016/2026:The Electricity Development Decade 2016/2026 was recently launched by Nepal’s Energy Ministry to eradicate the decade-long national electricity crisis. One of the major thrusts of this crusade that envisages commissioning 9,935 MW of hydropower plants within the 2016/2026 decade is on the 11 storage projects with an installed capacity of 5,373 MW. These storage projects are in addition to Nepal’s 10,800 MW Karnali Chisapani Multipurpose Project[1] of many decades ago now being readied for ‘re-activation’ at an appropriate[2] time. Already in Nepal’s ‘electricity development’ net is the 3,300 MW Saptakoshi High Dam that has strategically roped in the Sunkoshi-Kamala Storage-cum-Diversion scheme[3]. The 6,480 MW Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project, ratified by the Nepalese Parliament in 1996 for making Nepal’s ‘sun rise from the west’, is still stuck in deep quagmires[4]. Nepal’s Electricity Development Crusade 2016 totally ignores Nepal’s strategic position in the Ganges basin. India’s thirst for freshwater will increase to formidable proportions by 2050 when her population is expected to stabilize at around 1,640 million[5]. Nepal studiously fails to read the writing on the wall: India’s most burning problem is freshwater.

Water Scarcity in Ganges Basin:The World Bank’s 2012 Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment[6] (GSBA), though a contentious document for Nepal, has a wealth of valuable information. The Ganges basin, as per the 2011 census, has a population of 656 million where 576 million Indians live (47 percent of India’s population). Nepal’s three bordering States of UP (199 million), Bihar (104 million) and West Bengal (91 million) have a staggering combined population of 385 million, far greater than that of USA. The Ganges basin has the world’s highest population density and as a consequence poverty level borders that of sub-Sahara region. This is India’s Hindu cow belt where water is increasingly getting scarce. To tackle this dire thirst of the Ganges basin, India’s National Water Development Agency (NWDA) prepared a National Water Master Plan with inter-basin water transfer – from the water rich basin in the east (Bihar) to the water poor basin in the west (Rajasthan) – thus giving birth in 1987 to the Interlinking of Rivers (ILR).

India’s Interlinking of Rivers (ILR): This Interlinking of Rivers has two major components, the Himalayan and Peninsular. The Himalayan component[7], where Nepal’s role is of vital importance, has 14 links with 6,099 km of canals, 9 big dams to provide 200/250 billion cubic meters (BCM) of additional water for irrigation benefits to 22 million hectares of land and provide 1,120 cumecs of water for flushing the Kolkata Port besides generating 30,000 MW of hydropower. The Peninsular component has 16 links with 4,777 km of canals including 94 tunnels, 27 big dams to provide 84 BCM of additional water to irrigate 13 million hectares and generate 4,000 MW of hydropower. Nepal, despite having a mere 13% of the total Ganga basin catchment area, contributes 47% of the average annual flow of the Ganges but during the critical dry months of February, March and April Nepal’s contribution to the Ganges flow increases[8] dramatically to as high as 75%.

Nepal in ILR’s Himalayan Component: Without storage projects in Nepal, India’s River Linking Project will remain in her drawing boards. Among the 14 Himalayan Links, the following five Nepal-related links is of vital importance to India:

 

·         Kosi-Mechi and Kosi-Ghagra(Karnali) Links:both links to be fed from 269 meter Kosi High Dam at Barahchhetra, live storage 9.4 billion cubic meters (BCM) of water and 3,300 MW of hydropower – Saptakosi High Dam already in the electricity producing net of Nepal Government.

 

·         Gandak-Ganga Link:to be fed by 263 meter high Budhigandaki dam, live storage 4.25 BCM and 1,200 MW of hydropower – Budhigandaki Project already in Nepal’s construction mode with 50% of the US$ 1 Billion promised by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his visit to Nepal in 2014.

 

·         Ghagra(Karnali)-Yamuna Link:to be fed from 270 meter high Karnali Chisapani dam, live storage 16.2 BCM of water and 10,800 MW of hydropower; Karnali Chisapani Dam on the verge of being ‘re-activated’ with Nepal Government Notices already floated to stop all construction works within the reservoir’s submergence area.

 

·         Sarada(Mahakali)-Yamuna Link:to be fed from 315 meter high Pancheshwar Dam, live storage 6.6 BCM of water and 6,480 MW of hydropower[9]; Pancheshwar multipurpose project ratified by Nepalese Parliament in 1996 and the instruments of ratification between the two governments already exchanged in 1997.

 

These over 263 meter (868 feet) high four dams in Nepal, sitting atop seismically active zones, have a live storage of 36.5 BCM of water. The famed 226 meter high Bhakra Nangal dam, that Nehru termed ‘temple of resurgent India’, has a mere live storage of 6.9 BCM.

Nepal’s Storage Projects in Electricity Development Crusade 2016/2026: To supplement the above mentioned massive storage projects, the Government of Nepal has now embarked on the following 11 storage[10] making crusade projecting even the estimated completion date:

Project              Capacity       Live Storage[11]    District       Estimated \Completion                                                                                                                                                                                   

1. Uttar Ganga     300 MW          0.82 BCM         Baglung                AD 2024

2. Tanahu Seti      140 MW          0.29 BCM         Tanahu                AD 2024

3.Dudhkosi         300 MW          0.69 BCM         Okhaldhunga          AD 2025

4. Budhigandaki  1,200 MW       4.25 BCM      Gorkha/Dhading     AD 2025

5. West Seti          750 MW          0.84 BCM        Doti                           AD 2025        

6.  Tamor              692 MW          1.90 BCM    Panchthar/Taplejung   AD 2026

7. Sunkosi 3      536 MW          1.20 BCM  Ramechhap/Sindhuli/Kavre  AD 2026

8. Khimti Those   500 MW       ------       Ramechhap/Dolakha                AD 2026

9. Langtang          300 MW          ------      Rasuwa                                    AD 2026

10.Naumure      245 MW     0.58 BCM    Arghakhanchi/Pyuthan          AD 2026

11. Nalsingh Gad  410 MW   0.41 BCM        Jajarkot                            AD 2026

Total: 5,373 MW         10.98 BCM of Live Storage

India’s famed but controversial 263 meter high Tehri dam has a live storage of only 3.5 BCM.

World Bank’s Findings and Stakeholders’ Harmonization: The World Bank’s 2012 Ganges Strategic Basin Assessment[12] (GSBA) has come out with some very startling findings for Nepal:

 

·         Storages in Nepal store ‘significantly little’ water so flood control in India are ‘very limited’. For Nepal, this translates to: delete all downstream flood control benefit!

·         Storages in Nepal can ‘double lean season flows’, but agricultural productivity in India is ‘currently very low’ from such augmented flows. For Nepal, this again translates to: despite doubling the lean season flows, delete for the time being all downstream irrigation benefit!

·         Nepal’s ‘hydropower and trade is significant …. negotiations simpler than previously thought’.

 

The World Bank’s finding essentially translates to: Nepal should go all out to develop hydropower on a fast track mode forfeiting not only all downstream benefits but all social and environmental costs as well! 

 

There is, thus, a complete harmonization among the three concerned stakeholders: i) India, the downstream riparian, in dire need of storages in Nepal to augment the diminishing Ganges flow ii) the financing institution World Bank, the honest broker, strongly recommending Nepal to ride on the wave of significant hydropower trade with negotiations simpler than previously thought of andiii) Nepal,the Storage Provider, straining at the leash to gleefully plunge into the crusade of developing 10,000 MW in ten years – 2016/2026!

 

Nepal’s Stored Water in Ganges Basin:Nepal has consistently failed to see the larger picture on the wall – Nepal’s strategic position as the water tank of the Ganges Basin.

 

 

i)                    India in March 1990 presented to Nepal a Secret Draft[13] Agreement on Mutual Cooperation wherein Article III on Water Resources Cooperation stated:

 

·         The two Contracting Parties being equally desirous of attaining complete and satisfactory utilization of the waters of the commonly share rivers, undertake to

·         (i) plan new uses or projects subject to the protection of the existing uses on the rivers and

·         (ii) cooperate with each other to formulate and modify the planned new uses or projects taking into consideration the water requirements of the parties.

 

Commonly shared rivers, subject to the protection of existing uses and cooperate to formulate and modify planned new uses” are the very central core of India’s water policy vis-à-vis Nepal. Not that Nepal’s policy makers are illiterate of India’s above water policy but, for reasons best known to them, they feign ignorance.

 

ii)                  Bhim Subba[14], a Bhutanese engineer of Nepalese origin, penned in 2002:

 

·         success of an Indian water strategyto meet the growing water demand …..hinges on Nepal;

·         fundamental flaw……Nepal has been trying to sell electricity while it is water that India needs;

·         short-sighted on the part of India to continue pursuing the current strategy which pins its hope on overcoming, by default, the impending water crisis through power projects;

·         India should concede thatregulating the Ganga waters is her primary concern; Nepal must…..redirect its efforts from trying to sell electricity to fulfilling this need for regulated water;

·         Most importantly, ……stored water has monetary value and that this price must be attractive enough for Nepal to find it viable to design and build projects that optimize water storage instead of maximising power generation only!

 

The fundamental flaw Bhim Subba pointed out in 2002, Nepal desperately trying to sell electricity while India desperately trying to get free stored water through Nepal’s default, continues to this day of 10,000 MW in 10 years crusade. The Bhutanese Bhim Subba argues that stored water has monetary value and thatthe price of this stored water must be attractive enough for Nepal to find it viable to design and build projects that optimize water storage instead of maximizing power generation. Such a policy would be “mutually beneficial” and thus create a win-win environment for both Nepal and India.

Conclusion: For the Nepalese policy framers of 10,000 MW in 10 years, the above prescription of a Bhutanese of Nepalese origin would indeed be a very bitter pill to swallow. Besides the live storages of 32 BCM of water from Pancheshwar, Saptakosi and Karnali Chisapani, these policy framers are hell-bent on developing over 5,000 MW of 11 storage projects to avail an additional 11 BCM of regulated water GRATIS to India. India’s controversial 263 meter high Tehri dam, showcased to all Nepalese VIPs visiting Delhi, has a mere live storage of 3.5 BCM! This article must not be misunderstood to mean that Nepal should refrain from developing all storage projects. Storage projects should and must be built but, for the time being, simply those that cater to Nepal’s own system[15] requirements. By venturing into the storage building ‘jihad/crusade’ in her Electricity Development Decade 2016/2026, Nepal is taking “a great leap BACKWARD” by forgoing the value of stored water and by forfeiting the huge social and environmental costs of her people!

[1] Under the UNDP grant, 410 Nepalese engineers (in batches of 50 engineers per year) graduated from India’s premier Roorkee University for employment in the 10,800 MW Multipurpose Karnali Chisapani Project. The first batch of 50 Nepalese students was sent to Roorkee in 1982. With no Karnali Chisapani project on their return from Roorkee, the Nepal government had great difficulty in adjusting these 400 engineers. Many migrated abroad for jobs with some even in India.

[2] Please see the undated Public Notice in the web site of Energy Ministry regarding Karnali Chisapani Multipurpose Project.

[3] The Kosi Basin Master Plan Study, conducted with JICA’s assistance, recommended two top priority projects: Sunkosi-Kamala Diversion for irrigating 175,000 hectares in Dhanusha/Siraha and the ‘cheapest” 402 MW Arun III. As usual, Nepal ended up with both the Sunkosi-Kamala Diversion and Arun III in somebody’s plate.

[4] Some key issues are: sharing of project cost in proportion to accrued benefits, assessment of power benefit as compared with ‘relevant’ alternatives available, equal entitlement of Mahakali waters without prejudice to their existing consumptive uses, precludes the claim in any form the unutilized portion of the Mahakali waters etc. etc.”

[5] The Vital Links by Suresh Prabhu in Interlinking of Rivers in India: Issues and Concerns edited by MMQ Mirza, AU Ahmed and QK Ahmad, 2008, Taylor & Francis Group, London.

6] This GSBA is a World Bank South Asia Regional Report for Discussion of Regional Opportunities and Risks published in 2014.

[7] Impacts of Interlinking on Nepal by DN Dhungel & SB Pun in Interlinking of Rivers in India: Issues and Concerns edited by MMQ Mirza, AU Ahmed and QK Ahmad, 2008, Taylor & Francis Group, London.

[8] Overview: Conflicts Over the Ganga? By SB Pun in Disputes Over the Ganga edited by Bhim Subba and Kishor Pradhan for Panos Institute South Asia. 2004. Kathmandu.

[9]  Nepal, with the concept that peaking power fetches high price in India, had the Pancheshwar DPR prepared for 6,480 Mw. Media reports that this has now been downsized to 5,600 MW to optimize regulation of stored water.

[10] Energy Ministry’s National Electricity Crisis Eradication and Concept Paper and Work Plan on Electricity Development Decade, 2072. Singha Durbar, Kathmandu Falgun 2072.

[11] Live storage figures indicated in this chart were kindly availed by Engineering Services/NEA. Writer regrets live storages of Langtang and Khimti Those could not be availed.

[12] This GSBA study was led by Claudia Sadoff and Nagaraja Rao Harshadeep of the World Bank.

[13] Avtar Singh Bhasin. Nepal’s Relation with India and China – Documents 1947-1992. 1994. SIBA EXIM Pvt Ltd. Delhi.

[14] Bhim Subba in Water, Nepal and India in Kanak Mani Dixit and Shastri Ramachandaran edited book State of Nepal. 2002. Himal Books. Lalitpur Nepal. Bhim Subba, Bhutan’s first electrical engineer, worked for the Royal Government of Bhutan from 1975 onwards heading the kingdom’s power department from 1986. But in 1991, he landed up in Nepal as one of the 125,000 Bhutanese refugees. He has authored Himalayan Waters, 2001, published by the Panos Institute South Asia, Kathmandu. Like all Bhutanese refugees, he has migrated abroad. This Bhutanese refugees episode is another shameful state of affairs of the 28 million nation bullied by a nation of 600,000 – a 1991 population census claimed by Bhutan government! With over 100,000 Bhutanese kindly resettled in their countries by the governments of USA, Canada, UK, Australia etc., Bhutan still continues to bully Nepal by refusing to take back her remaining 12,000 citizens, languishing at the Jhapa refugee camps!

[15] Recently on December 5, 2016, the Government of India “in order to promote transparency” issued the Guidelines on Cross Border Trade of Electricity stressing that cross border electricity trade involved “issues of strategic, national and economic importance”. For cross border electricity trade with India from hydropower projects in Nepal,  the guidelines provisioned preferential treatment for the entities (generation projects, power trading companies) that have majority equity investment of Indian public and private sector. Thus, India has finally stated why she is reluctant to “open up” her huge energy market on issues pertaining to “strategic, national and economic importance”. India is sending the strong message to third party foreign investors that Nepal’s hydropower projects for Indian market will be ‘orchestrated’ on a case by case basis. Yet our government, crowing over US$ 13.5 billion FDI commitment in the recent March 2017 Nepal Investment Summit, still fails to read the writing on the wall: India’sGuidelines on Cross Border Trade of Electricity!

 

 

The article is the property of New Spotlight News Magazine.
 © 2010 New Spotlight Nepal 2010. All rights reserved. No part of this site may be reproduced without our written permission.